Personal diary of John Barnabas (aka Barney) Leith
Random header image... Refresh for more!

Posts from — June 2006

A rotten bit of luck - correction

When my good friend Jael Bharat emailed me a while ago from Oxford about his stroke, I posted what he had written without including his name. Now he’s emailed to say that part of one sentence was omitted in the version he sent to his friends. You can find the correct version here.

And while you’re about it, have a look at the rest of Jael and Sandy’s Spirituality for Daily Life website.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

June 30, 2006   No Comments

Contact lenses

My new optometrist, Nigel Burnett Hodd, reminded me yesterday that I had had my first contact lenses in December 1963. They were fitted, at a cost of ?43, by K Clifford Hall. Of course, ?43 in those days would be the equivalent of some ?700 today.

This was my first contact lens check-up since January 2004. David Evershed-Martin, who was my optometrist, developed cancer. Thankfully he’s now over his chemo and is, apparently well. He’s retired from his London practice and recommended Mr Burnett Hodd. That’s how it’s been since 1963. After Mr Clifford Hall retired, I was passed on to Miss Kathleen Thompson, who had been his assistant. When she retired she passed me on to Mr Evershed-Martin, and he passed me on to Mr Burnett Hodd.

It seems to be a family business. Mr Burnett Hodd’s father had been trained by Clifford Hall. Mr Evershed-Martin’s father had been one of the pioneers of corneal contact lenses in the UK. They all know each other and, it is passing on down to the next generation. Mr Burnett Hodd’s daughter is training as an optometrist, it seems.

Computer-based technology has had a huge impact on optometry since my first session with Clifford Hall 42 years ago. Mr Burnett Hodd and his able technician tested and measured my eyes for focal length, field of vision, and glaucoma by a range of machines, including what to me was a new experience, having my retinas photographed. Not a pleasurable experience - the machine flashed a bright light through my pupils that left me seeing nothing but a purple disk for several moments. But the pictures which came up on the computer screen were fascinating: there were my retinas, my optic nerve, my macula, the blood vessels, all showing in colour. Mr Burnett Hodd then used the mouse to draw a green line around the optic nerve of each eye, the computer performed a quick analysis and showed where there might be worrying thinning of the optic nerve due to glaucoma.

I’m glad to say I got green ticks around most of my optic nerves. Just a couple of yellow cautions for one eye.

And finally the machine in the upstairs room that takes photos of the almost the entire inside surface of the eye. This was a new machine and I paid extra for its services, but Mr Burnett Hodd informed me that it had allowed him to detect ’serious pathologies’ in five of his patients. Without the machine no one would have known about them until the conditions were more serious.

Forty-five minutes later and quite a bit lighter in the wallet I walked out into the hot summer sun on Devonshire Street with a clean bill of optic health and the welcome news that I would not need new lenses or specs. Not this time, anyway.

Technorati Tags:

June 30, 2006   3 Comments

A Bedouin tent in the City?

A Bedouin tent in the City of London seems a positively eccentric thing to have built, but it is there, behind the St Ethelburga’s Centre for Reconciliation and Peace, of which it is a part. The Tent, which was opened by Prince Charles on 4 May, provides an interesting space for inter-faith dialogue, intimate, warm and… well, it has to be said, odd. Mind you, odd is not a bad thing. In fact, odd is a good thing, since it helps demolish the walls of preconception that tend to divide us.

Tent interior 1

Last night I spoke as part of the Tent’s Voices programme. The theme was spiritual authority: its role and how we relate to it. There were two other speakers: Dr Usama Hasan, an astronmer and imam, and Citisakti Devadasi, a Hindu priest (who also happens to be a psychiatrist). A common theme was the need for a guide on the spiritual path. For Usama, his guides have been various teachers he has turned to throughout his life and training as a scholar and imam. He showed us his ‘family tree’, the chain of scholars and teachers who linked him back to the Prophet Muhammad - there were only 25 names in the chain, covering 14 centuries.

Citisakti spoke about her spiritual master, who had departed the earth one year and two days before. For her, the link with God was through her guru, who was a pure being, free of ego.

Ego was another theme than ran through the evening. How does one know whether the teacher, guide, spiritual master or what you will who is guiding you on the path is a true person, someone who’s guidance one can trust?

I reflected on the centrality in Baha’i thinking and practice of the independent investigation of truth - an inescapable responsibility that each and every one of us has. I also reflected on the responsibility that rests on everyone who has recognized Baha’u'llah to teach others and to guide them to the Word of God. And it is the Word of God that is the final authority. The first two paragraphs of Baha’u'llah’s Tablet to Manikchi Sahib (in the newly published Tabernacle of Unity volume) are eloquent testimony to the Primal Word:

In the Name of the One True God

Praise be to the all-perceiving, the ever abiding Lord Who, from a dewdrop out of the ocean of His grace, hath reared the firmament of existence, adorned it with the stars of knowledge, and admitted man into the lofty court of insight and understanding. This dewdrop, which is the Primal Word of God, is at times called the Water of Life, inasmuch as it quickeneth with the waters of knowledge them that have perished in the wilderness of ignorance. Again it is called the Primal Light, a light born of the Sun of divine knowledge, though whose effulgence the first stirrings of existence were made plain and manifest. Such manifestations are the expressions of the grace of Him Who is the Peerless, the All-Wise. He it is who knoweth and bestoweth all. He it is who transcendeth all that hath been said or heard…

It is clear and evident, therefore, that the first bestowal of God is the Word, and its discoverer and recipient is the power of understanding. This Word is the foremost instructor in the school of existence and the revealer of Him who is the Almighty. All that is seen is visible only through the light of its wisdom. All that is manifest is but a token of its knowledge. All names and are but its name, and the beginning and end of all matters must needs depend upon it.

And I spoke of the authority of the Manifestation, of ‘Abdu’l-Baha, of the elected institutions. I emphasized that no individual has the kind of spiritual authority in the Faith that individuals in other faiths do. And I spoke of the importance of consultation as a means of deepening our understanding of the Word, which has 70 times 70 meanings.

When each of the three had spoken, there was time for questions and answers. Then a tea break. And then open discussion, each of the 20 or so participants free to speak from her or his own perspective about spiritual authority. An elderly Anglican lady said something that seemed very sensible: she didn’t think in terms of spiritual guides who were far ahead on the path; rather she preferred the thought of a companion on the journey who may already have travelled that bit of the path. Ah, I thought, like a study circle tutor: not an authority, but a companion on the path. I tried to make it clear that we are all learning together, but some of the participants were clearly fascinated at the notion of an individual ‘master’ or guide.

A lady told me during the break that she was on a spiritual search and greatly attracted to the Faith. She and an Anglican chap plied me with questions about the Faith throughout the break. When I returned to the Tent for the second half of the evening, I found another lady looking through my copy of Tabernacle of Unity and asking where she could buy it. She had Baha’i friends and thought they would help her to get hold of it. I said it was only newly available in the UK - she may scare the wits out of her Baha’i friends by knowing about a volume of Baha’i scripture that they haven’t yet realized is available! She was clearly deeply attracted to this beautiful section of that wonderful Tablet.

The evening allowed people to speak from their hearts. Justine Huxley, who organizes the Voices programme, was glad that I felt this way and that I didn’t have to defend the ‘official’ Baha’i line. I should have explained, but didn’t, that Baha’is don’t distinguish in this way between the ‘official’ line and their own personal ‘line’. We acknowledge that we have diverse understandings - how could we not, given the diversity of our backgrounds and ways of thinking? - but that we always turn to the Centre of the Covenant for authoritative guidance.

Of course, one always hears some nonsense during such dialogue sessions. One lady spoke of ‘indigo children‘ - she was in contact with her master (or masters) through deep trances, she said, speaking to people who were sometimes thousands of years old.

After the session, I walked from St Ethelburga’s, along Bishopsgate, to Liverpool Street Station through the cooling evening air. Traffic was much lighter than it had been earlier in the evening when I arrived. I caught up with the elderly Anglican lady and we chatted about inter-faith dialogue and spiritual authority. i told her I liked the idea of companions on the journey - not authorities, but fellow travellers.

The Tent has a special place in my heart. I was invited to represent the Faith during the opening ceremony on 4 May. I was asked to speak for no more than a minute (!) about why inter-faith dialogue is important for Baha’is. Representatives of other faiths did the same. Prince Charles was sitting in the front row listening to all of this (we were in the main body of St Ethelburga’s). A selected few, among them the Baha’i representative, then went into the Tent (which holds 20 comfortably) to present copies of their scriptures to the Tent for use in the dialogue sessions that take place there - I presented a copy of the Kitab-i-Iqan as most suitable for a space dedicated to inter-faith dialogue. Mindful of Baha’u'llah’s strictures in the Aqdas about those who sit by the door but covet the highest seat, I sat by the door - and tried hard not to covet the highest seat.

Somebody gave me a shove. ‘Go and sit over there,’ she said (’she’ was a Buddhist monk, if I remember correctly). ‘Over there’ was next door to Prince Charles. So casually, as if this was a daily occurrence, I got up, walked across the tent, and sat down next to the Prince. I mean, I was close enough that I could have nudged him with my right elbow. We were drinking chai from delicate glasses. He turned to me and commented on the beauty of the tent. And so the conversation got going: informal, light-hearted, one chap chatting to another chap about this wonderful tent and the importance of inter-faith dialogue. I truly felt that it would be wonderful to get to know him as a friend.

On my left was Princess Badiya el-Hasan of Jordan.

Me? A thorn between two roses.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

June 30, 2006   3 Comments

Flash physics

Here’s another site you absolutely have to visit. Watch and play with the Flash animations that illustrate aspects of computation, physics and numbers.

Ooh, it’s such fun!

Technorati Tags: , , ,

June 28, 2006   2 Comments

Now you see it, now you don’t

Have a look at this quite extraordinary visual illusion. I’m sure there must be an explanation, but I have no idea what it is.

Technorati Tags:

June 28, 2006   No Comments

Working for equality in the criminal justice system

My main business for the morning was the first meeting of the Single Equality Scheme Project Board at the offices of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). The Board, which will drive the development of the CPS’s Single Equality Scheme, comprises CPS staff and ‘externals’ (as we were charmingly labelled at the meeting): representatives of each of the six equality ’strands’ that now have a place in English law and for which the Commission for Equality and Human Rights (CEHR)will have responsibility, once it comes into being later this year. These strands are the three statutory strands of race, disability, gender; and the three ‘new’ strands (new, that is to the government and legal system) of sexual orientation, religion and belief, and age.

I find myself being appointed to bodies of this kind (including the Attorney General’s Equality and Diversity Advisory Group) because I chair the Religion and Belief Consultative Group on Equality, Diversity and Human Rights (RBCG), which provides a contact point for the new Department of Communities and Local Government and the CEHR transition team with faith communities, faith-based organizations, and non-religious belief communities (I’m the Baha’i representative on the RBCG, but represent the RBCG on these other equality bodies).

I’m used to dealing with human rights matters, but I find myself having to learn a great deal very quickly to function in the world of equality and diversity bodies - there’s legislation and there’s the language of equality and diversity, and now I have to learn enough about the criminal justice system in England and Wales to be able to make sensible comments on the CPS’s Single Equality Scheme.

The CPS prosecutes criminal cases investigated by the police in England and Wales (but not in Scotland or Northern Ireland - they have their own arrangements).

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

June 28, 2006   No Comments

Foreign Office interfaith reception

Commuting into and around London can be challenging at the best of times, but yesterday had that little extra element of a fire at a building site near King’s Cross station. The Fire Service had decreed that King’s Cross should be closed (a couple of gas cylinders on the site might explode and send shrapnel flying across the station - not to mention the tower cranes that might collapse on the King’s Cross signalling centre) First Capital Connect, our commuter train operator was running an emergency timetable and trains were only going as far as Finsbury Park. The train I was on was in a queue of trains waiting to get into Finsbury Park, which was stretched to capacity with the unusual crowds of commuters.

It usually takes me around 45 or 50 minutes to get from home to work. Yesterday it took about 105 minutes.

Yesterday’s highlight (apart from a meeting with Gary Streeter MP) was an interfaith reception in the Durbar Court of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. FCO Minister Lord Triesman of Tottenham hosted a large reception with Ambassadors and senior representatives of Britain’s major faith communities, including the Baha’i community. The Durbar Court is a glorious courtyard at the heart of the FCO building in King Charles Street. It goes the full height of the building and is topped with a modern glass roof. It is full of reminders of Britain’s imperial past, with names of famous cities of the Empire at the level of the frieze. It is also a very noisy space, with a lot of echo. I’ve a problem with my left ear at the moment, which makes it difficult to hear clearly on that side - a problem greatly exacerbated by the echo in the Durbar Court.

Lord Triesman spoke of the important role of faith in society and of the work the UK government is doing with faith communities here and overseas. I met a number of my friends from the Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Jain, and Zoroastrian communities. I didn’t see any Buddhist or Sikh friends (although there were Buddhists and Sikhs there). None of us was sure what the occasion of the reception was, but it’s always good fun to drink tax-payers’ orange juice and eat tax-payers’ canapes. Of course, the real point is to ‘network’ (as the usage is) - in other words, to shake hands, talk to people, reinforce friendships, discuss things.

Father Fergus Capie of the London Interfaith Centre and I spoke about the importance of dialogue between people of faith and people with non-religious beliefs, such as the Humanists. Fergus wants to include such dialogue in the LIFC programme and I agree with him that this is a potentially important area of dialogue. While Humanists and Baha’is, for example, have different metaphysical beliefs, they may have things in common concerning justice, human oneness and other principles and values. I’ve certainly found shared values in the conversations I have had with my Humanist friends.

I left the reception early and caught a train from Finsbury Parkn to Hatfield, where I had supper with my daughter, Hari and her husband, Doug (not to forget young Jake).

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

June 28, 2006   2 Comments

Jacob’s ‘half birthday’

Our No. 3 grandchild, Jacob, is six months old today. Happy ‘half birthday’, Jakey!

Technorati Tags:

June 26, 2006   4 Comments

Legoland with grandchildren

Erica and I had a great family weekend with Ethan and Emily, two of our grandchildren, and their parents, Alex and Charlie. We took them all to Legoland Windsor on Saturday (24 June) to celebrate Ethan’s 6th birthday.

We struggled through the traffic that was heading for the races at Royal Ascot - stretch and ultra-stretch limos, Jaguars, Rollers, mini-buses, coaches, all filled with women with large and ornate hats, men with top-hats and morning coats. Who says Britain is a classless society? We took a signed diversion. The sign promised it would be a longer but much faster route to Legoland - the only problem was the first diversion sign was the only diversion sign, so we relied on our sat nav. The route took us through a residential back road, past a much needed filling station and back onto the route we would have taken anyway. Alex and Charlie took an even longer route through Windsor Great Park.

Anyway, we eventually arrived. The adults were desperate for coffee, the kids were desperate to get down to the real business of the day - the rides and attractions. The adults won the first round!

Legoland Windsor is on a hillside overlooking the flat lands east towards Heathrow airport and on to London. From the top we could see one plane after another taking off from Heathrow, a procession that lasted all day, hundreds upon hundreds of people projected into the air and heading off across the world.

There’s no doubt that Legoland Windsor is a pretty good theme park for young children. Everything seems to have been designed with them in mind. Ethan would have been quite happy just to look at Miniland, Lego’s version of some major European cities - mind you, anyone hoping to gain a sense of London’s topography from the Miniland layout would find themselves completely disoriented in the real city. There are rides that are suitable for young children, such as the Skyrider, and there also bigger, faster rides for the more daring.

There’s an enjoyable live-action show, ‘The Secret of the Scorpion Palace‘, very ‘Boy’s Own Adventure’ stuff, full of stereotypes such as ‘the evil sultan’ and ‘evil henchmen’ (although some of the henchmen were actually henchwomen - so I suppose we should say ‘henchpersons’ in these politically correct times). One of the henchpersons came through the audience, who were sizzling in the very un-British heat, and talked to the kids, pushing their hats off and so on. She wound Ethan up and knocked his cap off.

We all enjoyed the 4-D Theatre of the Imagination - basically 3-D cinema (we were handed polarizing specs so that we could see the film in 3-D) with strobe lights, CO2 smoke, splashes of water and other effects. All the characters were made of Lego and the film was dubbed in a kind of non-language that could have been English or Danish or a mixture. One could understand the tone of voice that the characters were using, but there were no real words. Not that it mattered, the story was simple and the 3-D animation was the thing.

There’s a train ride called the ‘Orient Expedition’. We were bowling happily along, enjoying the sunshine and the Lego scenery, when suddenly we heard screaming and laughter from the carriages in front of ours. Not long before we found out why. The train was being liberally sprayed with water by some of the Lego animals at the trackside. Later Alex and I found some buttons on the fence posts beside the path running above the track. Pushing the buttons started the water spraying over the track. So, we waited and as the next train came past, Alex pushed one of the buttons, some little boys pushed the buttons on neighbouring posts. The engine driver got the first spraying and slowed the train. Carriage by carriage the passengers felt the water and started to scream and laugh and duck down to avoid getting any wetter. And I don’t suppose any of them realized who was causing them to get wet. Such power! But all good fun, and we all dried off quickly in the warm sun.

Ethan and Emily finished the day at Waterworks, the Legoland water-play area. It was the noisiest area in the park, filled with the high-pitched shrieks of excitement and laughter that young children emit when they’re enoying themselves with water. Most of the children were in their bathing gear, but there were a couple of Muslim girls fully dressed in shalwar kameeze and hejab who were also getting themselves soaked and having a great time. Their mum didn’t seem to mind at all!

All in all pretty good for a UK theme park - never completely up to Disney standards, but the kids (and the adults) enjoyed it. A warning: food and drink inside the park cost arms and legs. We took a picnic and bottles of water to try to keep the costs down.

Enjoy my photos of the day on Flickr.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

June 26, 2006   2 Comments

Yet again

Yet again I’ve neglected my blog. I can make all sorts of excuses, some of which may bear some resemblance to the truth. I have been very busy; some of my work involves a lot of writing, so when I get round to thinking about posting something in my blog just feel weary and written out.

Believe that, if you will…

Technorati Tags:

June 23, 2006   2 Comments